Jim Gilchrist’s bagman responds to a charge of shopping an endorsement… without responding. (UPDATE: Proof)

I nailed Jim Gilchrist and his sham group of Minutemen for selling their endorsement of Parker Griffith for 6,500 bucks. (interview here)

I also pointed out Howie Morgan, former Gilchrist campaign manager and head of “The Election Impact Group” was the middleman.

Gilchrist NEVER denied the shopping of the endorsement and now Morgan is claiming my gripe is about an endorsement I don’t like.

“Dale Jackson is endorsing another candidate in the race, Mo Brooks,” said Morgan. “Fine. Awesome. Whatever. But for him to attack anyone who’s not endorsing Mo Brooks is crap.”

HE IS RIGHT… about me endorsing Mo Brooks. Because Mo Brooks is a good man with INTEGRITY!

Here is where he is wrong…

“On the air,” said Morgan, “Dale has said he agreed with every endorsement Jim ever made — except for the guy Dale’s endorsing and Jim isn’t! He’s got to accuse anyone who disagrees with him of a plot.”

There was a plot!

Fact: They shopped the endorsement to others in the 5th Congressional District who WOULD NOT pay for it. So they moved on to Parker Griffith and he paid the money and got the endorsement.

If Gilchrist was shopping his endorsements no one would have ever known had he stayed with truly conservative candidates. But he didn’t Griffith’s piss-poor immigration record is very easy to prove. This endorsement made no sense and that’s why the money issue matters.

Is Morgan arguing he sold the endorsement to conservatives too, so selling it to Griffith is fine?

Did he say he didn’t shop the endorsement?

Nope.

If Gilchrist wouldn’t have came here, with Howie Morgan less than two years ago and endorsed Griffith’s opponent no one would have thought anything of it.

I didn’t create the credibility issue here… Jim Gilchrist and Howie Morgan did.

Why isn’t Morgan/Gilchrist/Griffith saying the endorsement wasn’t shopped in this Distritct?

Because it was.

No Honor (for Parker Griffith)
No Integrity (for his supporters)
No Parker Griffith (for Congress)

UPDATE: I was hoping Griffith/Morgan/Gilchrist would show some integrity and own up to what went down here, but it is becoming clear that that will NEVER happen.

Here is your proof Morgan and Gilchrist shopped the the Minutemen endorsement.

12/22/2009

E-mail from Howie Morgan [mailto:howie@netdoor.com] to Mo Brooks [mailto:mobrooks@mobrooksforcongress.com]

I have been reading with great interest about your potential race for Congress in the next election cycle. As someone who has been the Campaign Manager in Tennessee races for Congress in both the 7th and 9th Congressional Districts (Marsha Blackburn’s first race in 2002 and Mark White’s first in 2006) I wanted to let you know I am interested in your race as well.

During subsequent negotiations between Mo Brooks and Howie Morgan, Howie Morgan promises the Minutemen endorsement if Mo Brooks will hire Howie Morgan.

12/28/09

Howie Morgan sends Mo his proposed contract (to be the campaign’s principal campaign consultant): Howie Morgan proposed cost: $8,000 flat fee + expenses + $18,000 “win” bonus. The Mo Brooks for Congress Campaign.

12/29/09

Howie Morgan to Mo Brooks email (seeking to persuade Mo Brooks to hire Howie Morgan): “The bottom line is we have to put Mr. Brooks in the best position to win. And crush the impostor Republican. ;-)

That impostor is Parker Griffith, who later hired Morgan and secured the endorsement.

It is black and white… Jim Gilchrist and the Minutemen are for sale.

My integrity is not in question here.

13 Responses

  1. Wow. That email sequence is pretty damning. Where’s the press on this?????

  2. Good job, Dale! Thanks for uncovering this and letting us know.

  3. Any chance the actual emails might be published at some future date?

  4. Again… You da man, Dale!!!

  5. I dont even like Parker Griffth but lets see you dispute Numbersusa.com http://www.numbersusa.com/content/my/congress/1283/reportcard/RECENT/

    This is his voting record.

    • Love to…

      Here is his voting record prior to trying to save his ass…

      Most of those grades come from co-sponsoring legislation… We have seen this game by Griffith before. http://www.flashpointblog.com/2008/08/03/parker-griffiths-real-position-on-illegal-immigration/

      * Amendment 102231-1 dealt with harboring or transporting illegal aliens. Griffith voted to table the amendment (Roll Call 358).
      * Amendment 102232-3 stipulated that when individuals are charged with a felony or DUI that a “reasonable effort” be made to determine their legal status. The amendment passed 26-4 with Griffith voting yes (Roll Call 359).
      * Amendment 102244-1 would have restricted illegal aliens from receiving “any postsecondary education benefit, including, but not limited to, scholarships or financial aid.” In Roll Call 360 Griffith voted to table the amendment.
      * Amendment 102247-1 would have dealt with the sale and distribution of fraudulent identification documents. Griffith voted to table this amendment as well (Roll Call 361).
      * Amendment 102249-3 required that authorities attempt to confirm the legality of persons in custody for a crime that required bail. Griffith voted to kill the amendment (Roll Call 362), but the motion to table the bill failed by a vote of 12-11. It then passed 21-4 (Roll Call 363), with Griffith changing his position and voting in favor along with other Democrats who supported tabling it just moments before. (He voted against it before he voted for it!)
      * Amendment 102254-2 required that motorists have a valid drivers license in their possession. The amendment passed 25-4 with Griffith voting yes (Roll Call 364).
      * Amendment 102240-1 would have required employers to verify the work eligibility status of all employees. Griffith also voted to table this amendment (Roll Call 365).

      Griffith voted to block five amendments that were direct excerpts from Beason’s bill. If Griffith is such a big supporter of Beason’s bill then why did he prevent its substitution and why did he then vote against five amendments to another bill that were taken word-for-word from Beason’s bill?

      He co-sponsors bills to get the street cred and campaigns on it and then kills the bills.

      You are welcome.

  6. [...] and Jim Gilchrist… (UPDATE: Interview added)Dale Jackson on ENDORSEMENTSDale Jackson on Jim Gilchrist’s bagman responds to a charge of shopping an endorsement… without respondi…James on Jim Gilchrist’s bagman responds to a charge of shopping an endorsement… without [...]

  7. [...] Jim Gilchrist’s bagman responds to a charge of shopping an endorsement… without respondi… [...]

  8. Marsha Blackburn Voted FOR:
    Omnibus Appropriations, Special Education, Global AIDS Initiative, Job Training, Unemployment Benefits, Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations, Agriculture Appropriations, U.S.-Singapore Trade, U.S.-Chile Trade, Supplemental Spending for Iraq & Afghanistan, Prescription Drug Benefit, Child Nutrition Programs, Surface Transportation, Job Training and Worker Services, Agriculture Appropriations, Foreign Aid, Vocational/Technical Training, Supplemental Appropriations, UN “Reforms.” Patriot Act Reauthorization, CAFTA, Katrina Hurricane-relief Appropriations, Head Start Funding, Line-item Rescission, Oman Trade Agreement, Military Tribunals, Electronic Surveillance, Head Start Funding, COPS Funding, Funding the REAL ID Act (National ID), Foreign Intelligence Surveillance, Thought Crimes “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, Peru Free Trade Agreement, Economic Stimulus, Farm Bill (Veto Override), Warrantless Searches, Employee Verification Program, Body Imaging Screening.

    Marsha Blackburn Voted AGAINST:
    Ban on UN Contributions, eliminate Millennium Challenge Account, WTO Withdrawal, UN Dues Decrease, Defunding the NAIS, Iran Military Operations defunding Iraq Troop Withdrawal, congress authorization of Iran Military Operations.

    Marsha Blackburn is my Congressman.
    See her unconstitutional votes at :
    http://mickeywhite.blogspot.com/2009/09/tn-congressman-marsha-blackburn-votes.html
    Mickey

  9. [...] Jim Gilchrist’s bagman responds to a charge of shopping an endorsement… without respondi… [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,041 other followers